Juan and joe are good friends. They both graduated from the same program and have gone to work in the same radiography department. Part of their…

Question Answered step-by-step Juan and joe are good friends. They both graduated from the same programand have gone to work in the same radiography department. Part of their duties is to be sure that the standby equipment is ready for service on the wards. Juan and Joe are working the night shift, and while playing around, Juan inadvertently bumps the equipment, tips it over, and breaks the standby instrument. In that it was an accident, Juan asks you, as a friend, not to tell anyone it was his fault. “Accidents do happen.” The two of you switch out the equipment, sending the broken piece down to maintenance, and put a working instrument on standby. In the morning your boss comes in and notices that the equipment has been sent down to maintenance. He asks what happened, and Iuan says, “I dunno. Someone from out of the Juan and loe are good friends. They both graduated from the same program and have gone to work in the same radiography department. Part of their duties is to be sure that the standby equipment is ready for service on the wards. Juan and Joe are working the night shift, and while playing around, Juan inadvertently bumps the equipment, tips it over, and breaks the standby instrument. In that it was an accident, Juan asks you, as a friend, not to tell anyone it was his fault. “Accidents do happen.’ The two of you switch out the equipment, sending the broken piece down to maintenance, and put a working instrument on standby. In the morning your boss comes in and notices that the equipment has been sent down to maintenance. He asks what happened, and juan says, “I dunno. Someone from out of the department must have bumped it or something.” The boss looks at you and asks you the same question. 1. Solve the problem using duty-oriented or principled reasoning. Remember that in this form of reasoning, it is not the consequences that are considered but rather the principles involved. 2. What principles are involved in this case? 3. WHAT any of the principles involved conflict with each other? 4. Do some principles have a higher value than others?A. Consider the following case: Dr. Jones is a very senior surgeon at a community hospital. it is common talk among the staff that his patients have a higher level of hospital-borne infections after surgery than do other doctors’ patients. in this case, the patient is a 38-year-old female who has undergone a full mastectomy for breast cancer. During postoperative care, you have found her to be very quiet, seemingly depressed, and not talkative with you or the family members who have come to visit. She seems to be in some pain during the treatments and has a low-grade fever. After a treatment, she asks you, “Is Dr. Jones a good surgeon?” 1. What are some answers you could give? List live possibilities. 2. Which of the ethical systems for decision making will you use in coming to an answer consequence, duty, or virtue ethics? 3. What answer will you give and why? B. Review the following case thinking in terms of the Ethics of Care: You and your sister are both physical therapists and are attending a professional conference. You’ve been asked by the conference leaders to take one of the speakers to his hotel following his lecture. You are thrilled by this as Dr. Smith is a noted medical scientist and Nobel Prize winner. On the way to the hotel, the three of you are involved in a horrible car accident that has resulted in a rapidly growing fire. You are fortunate enough to have been thrown out of the car and are available to help. Unfortunately, you only have the time and strength to rescue one of the two victims, the noted physician or your sister. Which will you choose? The Ethics of Care holds compassion, discernment, trustworthiness, integrity, and conscientiousness as guiding virtues in decisions. A consequentialist might have selected the scientist on the basis of the greater good. A duty-oriented ethicist might have held each victim as equal and used a criterion that allowed for a just decision between equals. 1. Would the fact you are a physical therapist have any effect on your decision? 2. Certainly rescuing your sister is the natural thing to do and an understandable choice. But is it the “right choice”? 3. In reality, even if you were a consequentialist, and thought the scientist might in the future do something great, would that really stop you from rescuing your sister? Would saving your sister feel like the natural thing to do? Is naturalness considered a strength of the Ethics of Care with its focus on responsibility? 4. One of the criticisms of the Ethics of Care is that it threatens to devolve into tribalism. There’s my group and i take care of them. As for the rest of you. you’re in your groups and in charge of yourselves. This isn’t “every man for himself,” but it comes close to “every social group for itself.” Do you think tribalism represents a potential problem with the Ethics of Care? C. A competent elderly patient tells you, “I want to go home.” You respond with, “We won’t let you go home; you’re not capable of taking care of yourself.” You may have just created the elements for what tort? D. The patient tells you, “I don’t want the treatment.” You respond with, “Your doctor ordered the treatment and told me to make sure you take it, even if I have to hold you down.” You may have just created the elements of what tort? E. Following her return home from the hospital, the patient became aware that the respiratory therapy technician on the day she checked out had given her a treatment that was meant for the patient in the next bed. The technician had not checked the wristband on the patient before giving the treatment. This was a deep-breathing treatment designed to make her cough and clear her lungs. Would the scenario produce a viable negligence action? If so, which type is the best fit? If not, what element is missing? Defend your answer. F. Would a surgical nurse with strong pro-life values be correct in refusing to take part in a therapeutic abortion? G. Following his return from the hospital after abdominal surgery, the patient continued to have pain and discomfort. Returning to the hospital for a checkup an X-ray was taken that showed a clamp had been left within the abdominal cavity during the surgery. If the patient decides to sue, do you think res ipsa loquitur would be a consideration? Explain why Health Science Science Nursing Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *